Paper #2 Bike Lanes Versus Car Lanes in NYC



Running Head:  BIKE LANES VERSUS CAR LANES IN NYC




Bike Lanes Versus Car Lanes In NYC
Diane A. Portillo
Molloy College





Objective
The objective of this study is to examine the issue of bike lanes versus car lanes in New York City through the lens of urban sociology.

Introduction
There is an ongoing battle in New York City between those who use bicycle lanes and those who drive cars.  Chapter 1 of the work entitled “NYC Cycling” on integration of NYC’s bicycle policy emphasizes the need for “integrated, rather than piecemeal, transportation planning.”  (Transportation Alternatives, 2009) Stated as well is the need for agencies to “work together” along with the bicycling community to bring about an improvement in conditions so that bicycling in New York City will increase.  (Transportation Alternatives, 2009)  The work of Forester (1994) entitled “Bicycle Transportation: A Handbook for Cycling Transportation Engineers” reports that the first trouble occurring with bike lanes in New York City is the congestion that was caused and the demand for on-street parking, in combination to real estate costs and the costs associated with conversion of older buildings that are so high that the curbside truck and taxi and off street loading and unloading occurred in traffic lanes and bike lanes were placed in the “conventional position between the parked cars and the motor lanes.” (Forester, 1994)


















I. The First Troublesome Occurrence in NYC over Bike Lanes
An ordinance was enacted in New York City that made a requirement that vehicles with authorization to double park for loading and unloading purposes “continue to do so in the motor traffic lane and not in the bike lane."  (Forester, 1994) This created an unsafe lane for the bikes since approximately 50% of the typical bike lane in Manhattan was not usable due to double-parking. The whole affairs resulted in a transit strike and a great deal of anger between cyclists, pedestrians, and cars.  The result was support by activists and the police department in New York City and the benefit of bike lanes being proclaimed by the Transportation Alternatives and American Youth Hostels.
Sociologists analyze bike lanes through the lens of what is termed the ‘critical mass’ and how the formation of the critical mass at some point in time serves to create “new permutations of social space through collective mobility” and as well to “open new possibilities that are both affective and political” and as stated by Jeff Ferrel to put:
“…ourselves and our bicycles on the line, confronting automobile dominance, through direct action, we invent the impossible: an island of safety, calm, and conversation in the middle of a busy street. And in reflexive fashion, we inhabit this island with talk of Critical Mass rides in other cities, strategies for surviving encounters with motorists, sabotage in the workplace, anarchist history and other subversions.” (Furness, 1994)

II. Bicycling Issues in NYC
It is reported that a bike lane that is “ambitious” in combination with a “greenway program” will serve to expand the interest and increase in cycling in New York City however, without safe bicycle parking facilities that growth will not be as rapid as it could potentially be with safe bike parking facilities.  Also needed are bike lanes that are of a better design and that bring about a reduction in the number of bicycle accidents involving cyclists in New York City.  These improvements are such that should accompany “public education and enforcement of traffic laws.” (Transportation Alternatives, 2009) Additionally required is an agreement by New York City agencies such as the Department of Transportation in New York City to restructure transportation in terms of both its priorities and its practices.  (Transportation Alternatives, 2009) The Bicycle Blueprint is stated to be much more than a set of policies geared toward bringing about an increase in bicycling in New York City, also presented in the blueprint is a “vision of New York City that is people-oriented and refuses to accept the cynical trade-off of short-term economic values for sustained human livability.”  (Transportation Alternatives, 2009) Also needed is a “substantial transfer of street space from automobiles to bicycles, in part through creating an extensive network of on-street bicycle lanes.” (Transportation Alternatives, 2009)
Bicycling is good for the environment and serves as well as “an active agent of motor-traffic restraint.” (Byme, 2010) It is reported in the work of Byme (2010) that Enrique Penalosa, the individual who “instituted bike and pedestrian streets and rapid transit in Bogota when he was mayor” that the lane that wasn’t safe for an 8 year old to ride in could not be considered as a bike lane whatsoever.


III. Bicycle Lane Design and Configuration
Designs such as those by Penalosa are reported to bring about a reduction in traffic congestion, gird the economy, and transform suburban areas into nicer places to reside.  Another designer is Jaime Lerner, former mayor of Curitiba, a city in Brazil that instituted recent changes in traffic configuration for the city, which is experiencing rapid expansion and growth and seeking urban planning that is low in cost. Although Lerner originally designed a transit system that is bus-based, his concepts could be applied in New York City for its bicycling lane configuration and involves dedicating roads to bicycles akin to train tracks and “tube-shaped stations, where riders prepay for lane access is accomplished quickly such as in a subway transit system. Bike parking design that has been considered for use in New York City is like that created by Penelosa and for the city of Tokyo in a double-deck fashion and one originally used in Williamsburg in a parking area located near the Bedford Avenue L-train station. The parking facility is one that is of a good design holding a great number of bikes. The facility is free and is considered as one that is highly functional and practical reducing bottlenecking due to scattered and disorganized bike parking in the area.  (Furness, 2010, paraphrased) Penalosa is stated to have written the following in the work entitled “The Politics of Happiness”:
“One common measures of how clean a mountain stream is to look for trout. If you find the trout, the habitat is healthy. It’s the same way with children in a city. Children are a kind of indicator species. If we can build a successful city for children, we will have a successful city for all people.” (Furness, 2010)
Byme reports that Penalosa held that pedestrian infrastructure that is well planned, functional, useful, and safe “shows respect for human dignity.” (2010) This is reported to result in the creation of a “different kind of society.” (Byme, 2010)














Summary and Conclusion
In conclusion bike lanes do not seem to be a subject in which public interest is waning in New York City but instead bike lanes are at the forefront of discussion and planning for the city that has a critical need to reduce traffic congestions and whose bike rider population appears to have met a ‘critical mass’ demanding that bike lane planning and construction be in earnest in the busy New York transit system.



Work Cited

Forester, John (1994) Bicycle Transportation: A Handbook for Cycling Transportation Engineers. MIT Press 30 Aug 1994. Retrieved from: http://books.google.com/books?id=Qz4kAulpimgC&dq=Bike+lanes+versus+car+lanes+in+New+York+City&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Furness, Zack (2010) One Less Car: Bicycling and the Politics of Automobility. University Press, 28 Mar 2010. Retrieved from: http://books.google.com/books?id=WV4QSnRqNwEC&dq=Bike+lanes+versus+car+lanes+in+New+York+City&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Managing Success in Center City:  Reducing Congestion, Enhancing Public Spaces. Center City District, Central Philadelphia Development Corporation.  Retrieved from: http://books.google.com/books?id=lmSGJgPm4CMC&dq=Bike+lanes+versus+car+lanes+in+New+York+City&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Transportation Alternatives (2009) NYC Bike Policy. Street Design. Retrieved from: http://www.transalt.org/files/resources/blueprint/chapter4/chapter4d.html

No comments:

Post a Comment